Market Notes: What Alphabet, Tesla, IBM, and Intel's Earnings Told Long-Term Investors This Week

The second week of Q2 2026 earnings season was a heavy one, and four of the largest, most widely followed companies in the market reported within about 24 hours of each other: Alphabet (Nasdaq: GOOGL) and Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) after the close on July 22, IBM (NYSE: IBM) the same afternoon, and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) on July 23. We follow these names for these Market Notes because their results say something about the wider economy and the AI build-out — not because they are recommendations to buy or sell (see the disclosures below). Here is what they actually reported, the encouraging and the cautionary alike, read through our usual lens: business quality, durability, and thinking about the news rather than reacting to it.

Why did Alphabet's record quarter still rattle investors?

Alphabet reported consolidated revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24%, with operating income up 30% to $40.8 billion and its Google Cloud unit accelerating to 82% growth, reaching $24.8 billion (SEC Form 8-K). CEO Sundar Pichai said "our AI investments are redefining what's possible across every part of our business" (earnings call transcript). Two caveats deserve equal billing. First, headline net income of $112.1 billion was flattered by roughly $99 billion of gains on equity securities — largely unrealized — so the operating business is a far smaller share of that eye-catching figure. Second, CFO Anat Ashkenazi raised full-year capital-spending guidance to $195–$205 billion, up from $180–$190 billion, and free cash flow turned negative in the quarter. Management frames the spending as investing "as long as we see an attractive return." Whether that return materializes is precisely the open question a long-term investor should keep in view.

Did Tesla's record revenue translate into profit?

Not this quarter, and the gap is the story. Tesla posted record revenue of about $28.2 billion, up 26%, on record second-quarter deliveries of 480,126 vehicles (earnings call transcript; Electrek). Yet operating income fell 57% to $398 million, compressing operating margin to 1.4%, and automotive gross margin excluding regulatory credits slipped to 16.3% from 19.2% a quarter earlier. Adjusted earnings of $0.33 per share missed expectations, and free cash flow was negative as capital spending more than doubled. Elon Musk told analysts, "this is a massive CapEx year," pointing to spending on autonomy, robotics, chips, and energy. The honest read: strong demand did not flow through to the bottom line, and a company deliberately trading near-term profit for long-term bets will produce uneven quarters. That is a description, not a judgment.

What did IBM and Intel's headline numbers hide?

Both older franchises showed how one-time items and mix can obscure the underlying business. IBM reported revenue of $17.2 billion, up 1%, with software up 5% but infrastructure down 7% — dragged by a 42% drop in Z mainframe revenue as a product cycle aged (IBM press release). The company had pre-announced a shortfall, and its shares had already fallen sharply (CNBC). CEO Arvind Krishna maintained that "we see no evidence of clients moving off mainframe" and held full-year guidance at 4–5% constant-currency growth (earnings call transcript).

Intel, by contrast, reported its strongest revenue growth in more than fifteen years — $16.1 billion, up 25%, led by a 59% jump in its data-center and AI segment (SEC Form 8-K). Yet the same filing showed an $11.0 billion GAAP net loss, driven almost entirely by a $12.5 billion non-cash mark-to-market charge on shares held in escrow under its CHIPS Act agreement with the U.S. government. On an adjusted basis Intel earned $0.42 per share. On the call, CEO Lip-Bu Tan's core message was that "strong demand for our products continue to outpace our growing supply," and the company raised 2026 capital spending to more than $20 billion — a step CFO David Zinsner framed as "a signal of our confidence in customers across all of our business units" (earnings call transcript). Here the distortion runs the opposite direction from Alphabet's: a large accounting charge made a growing operation look like a collapse.

The bottom line for long-term investors

This week was a case study in why headline net income is a poor place to stop reading. Alphabet's profit was inflated by paper investment gains; Intel's was buried by a paper charge; Tesla's record sales masked a real margin squeeze; IBM's modest top line masked genuine software growth alongside a fading hardware cycle. The common thread is capital spending: Alphabet, Tesla, and Intel are all pouring money into AI-related capacity, and none can yet prove the returns. For long-term investors, quarterly earnings are most useful for understanding businesses over time — separating durable strength from cyclical swings and one-time items — not for timing decisions around a single print.

---

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment, tax, or legal advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Consult your financial advisor about your specific situation. Companies mentioned are discussed for educational purposes only; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Disclosure: One or more of the securities discussed may be held in client accounts managed by VCP Financial. Holdings differ from client to client based on each client's individual objectives and circumstances, are not held by all clients, and are subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any specific security is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold that security, and should not be assumed to be profitable.